Change is the only constant while dealing with complex construction projects. Enhancement of scope and varying design requirements of the clients are quite common during a building project. While they may not seem troublesome when taken individually; however can create serious threats when taken collectively.
Thus, just as tiny drops of water can form a river; similarly small delays and disputes can lead to issues getting out of hands, ultimately resulting in a contract dispute. Amongst the contract dispute, disruption claim can be the biggest and most hard claim to swallow.
Disruption is often metaphorically linked to a ripple effect or a dependent impact. In short, it is a secondary impact that affects unchanged work and productivity losses.
Unlike direct impacts that can be estimated reliably through proper documentation and facts; the secondary effects of changes such as disruption claims are quite problematic. Hence, thanks to the services of quantum experts who come to resolve all quantification of disruption related issues.
But the question arises as to why handling and quantification of disruption damages so tricky?
These claims can be tricky to handle because of the cumulative impact they have on a number of modules. Since disruption doesn’t involve measurable factors and fundamentally involves rework and productivity which are certainly hard to measure.
Moreover, the most ideal forms of damage quantification is to define the value of disruption impact that is put on by the claimant, thus it can be a challenging task. Along with this, the discussion between stakeholders about project cost growth tend to be adversarial, even while the project continues, making efforts to quantify, explain, and mitigate disruption especially challenging.
Although hard to evaluate but through proper stepwise analysis and professional services of experts in quantum, dispute claims can be resolved immediately.
Here are the three steps to make the process easier.
First and the foremost task to perform as soon as a disruption claim arises is to prepare a case. Case should consist of three essential elements: liability, resultant injury and causation. For successful handling of claim these three factors shouldn’t be missed.
Approaches commonly used as the basis for quantifying contract damages include Modified Total Cost, CPM and Measured Mile. Each has its place, but none is without shortfalls for use in complex disputes over disruption damages.
The term quantification deals with converting all the delay and disputes in measurable and monetary units. As delays don’t occur in measurable standards, thus digging carefully into conversation of damages can be critical! Once a delay expert is done with identifying the total delay time in each module, quantum analysis comes at scene.
As, the quantification involves monetary calculation of disputes, thus best quantum experts should be hired to reach at a quick and thrifty solution!
Hence, construction claims are now no longer troublesome by the help of renowned construction claims consultants!
Everything you need to know about the construction project life cycle
Top Tips to carry out a hotel construction financial analysis
Causes of Schedule Delay in Project Completion